I am very happy right now, so I am just going to give a out little morsel to chew on. It seems the curmudgeon in me doesn't come out when my wife is next to me and we are enjoying a quiet moment pursuing our interests in good company. So I will be brief.
How is it that you never actually read a critic rave when you are getting the review first hand? Raving is speaking or writing with wild enthusiasm. So who is in charge of classifying a critics' words as wildly enthusiastic? No one in particular of course. That, my friends, is free entry into the scoundrel zone for these guys. If a critic writes anything positive or even neutral about a restaurant, film, TV show, car, or anything, you can bet some enterprising scoundrel will find a way to spin it into a "rave". No matter how mundane the critic's original meaning, and no matter how obvious it is to the audience, his/her words can be spun into a "rave" when an advertiser mentions the review in a commercial. And it is not technically lying or even mischaracterization of words since their meanings are in the eyes of the beholder - the ad exec's eyes. Then he gets to change the meaning of those words into whatever suits him when he relates them to the rest of us. It's a twisted game of telephone.
"Rave" is a word that has been stolen by advertisers. There others...
There ARE others...
ReplyDeleteI have to proofread better.
This is why you need a Livejournal. You can edit posts. ;)
ReplyDelete